![]() If you’ve ever taken a basic physiology course, you know that energy production all comes down to ATP. #LOW INTENSITY WORKOUT MANUAL#The term Joel Jamieson uses in his Ultimate MMA Conditioning manual for this type of training is cardiac ouptut, or CO for short.ĬO isn’t the only way to train the aerobic energy system, but it is a powerful one and has numerous benefits. Today we’re going to focus on long duratio. ![]() However, I would argue that aerobic training isn’t what you think it is, either. The Benefits of Long Duration, Low Intensity Cardio Let’s start with some of the basic physiology, and then we can get into why this stuff is actually important. Instead, a smart program will build an aerobic foundation, and then interweave high-intensity and low-intensity methods over time to build a more resilient and better conditioned athlete. I’m sorry, but there’s no one, universal type of conditioning that covers all the bases. Read The Tabata Myth blog post here on RTS for more info.) (Side note: Tabatas aren’t your average 20:10 interval repeated eight times. I’m pretty sure there are people that think a couple rounds of 20:10 Tabata-style intervals will cure cancer. high intensity interval training, or HIIT) is the solution to everything. I’m also tired of the overarching belief that one form of energy system training (i.e. I want their coaches (and these athletes) to understand there’s a lot more to conditioning and energy systems development than just “going hard.” When I see field sports athletes who are chronically sympathetic-dominant, go glycolytic and gas out 3 or 4 minutes into a game, it pisses me off. I don’t really care if you think I’m smart or not – I just want you to get better results. So you can thank that guy, because his incessant banter is why I’m writing this really long and drawn out blog post!īut there’s also a lot more to it than that. ![]() I’ve got some guy I’ve never heard of or met before telling me I don’t know what I’m talking about, that you can overtrain the left ventricle of the heart, blah blah blah. So the article hadn’t been out one day and I’m getting hate mail on Twitter. Originally I had hoped to cover the entire conditioning assessment we use here at IFAST, but quickly realized I had to whittle this down to make it manageable (and fit the editorial guidelines). Last but not least, I had to narrow all this down into one very small focus.In my opinion, this is a no-win situation as it’s always either “too much” or “too little” research. #LOW INTENSITY WORKOUT CODE#Others who just want the coaching takeaways couldn’t care less about the research, and assume if you’re referencing a bunch of articles and texts that it’s code you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. People that like science want science - they want everything cited and referenced. There’s almost no middle ground when it comes to citing work.Hell, some of my paid materials are 10’s of thousands of words in length, so 750-1000 words barely gets me warmed up, let alone allows me to prove a point. 750-1000 words can easily be an introduction to some of my longer articles.This stipulations alone lead to certain issues:: It wasn’t supposed to be too “science heavy,” and.There were a few stipulations to the article: ![]() So out of the blue, the NSCA asked me to write an article for their Performance Training Journal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |